Showing posts with label sponsorship scandal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sponsorship scandal. Show all posts

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Liberal Party of Canada: Reinforce Negative Frame

Ekos Poll show every demographic over 25 voting with their "wallets" and choosing the CPC during a period of Economic difficulty.

The elusive Female Vote has moved away from the Liberals.  The Liberals love to produce papers and reports and hold meeting to demostrate they care about the female vote.

The last Liberal bastion stronghold has been the Large Urban Centres.  Many immigrants who arrived under the Federal Liberal Governments are no longer holding to support them.


The CPC have done the heavy lifting and have been listening for years in tackling the problems facing this community. The dividends have been slowly paying off. Many Liberals simply don't get it, they are stuck on the scary Harper narrative. These voting blocks have slowly been moving away from the Liberal Party. The internet can produce many reasons why the voters are turning away in larger numbers from the Liberal Party.

                                                     CPC           LIB          NDP          GRN           BLOC       Sample             MOE









October 2008
http://www.ekospolitics.com/index.php/2008/10/snapshot-of-metropolitan-canada-october-13-2008/


The damage wrought by the sponsorship scandal was not confined to the 2004 election. In
2006, the probability of voting Liberal was 35 points lower among voters who were very angry
about the scandal, believed that there had been a lot of corruption under the Chrétien Liberals,
judged Martin’s handling of the scandal negatively and lacked confidence in his ability to
prevent future scandals. This was even stronger than the effect registered in 2004, but luckily for
the Liberals, judgments were not as harsh as they had been two years earlier. Still, but for the
scandal, the Liberal vote would have been over three points higher in 2006, enough to make the
difference between a bare plurality and defeat.


Understanding the problems faced by the Liberal Party is deeper than changing leaders or filming Ads in Narnia.

Will the Liberal Party reconnect with the grassroots and the public before the election?



Political Parties make strategic mistakes and reinforce 
a negative frame


The sponsorship scandal, "AdScam", "Sponsorship"or Sponsorgate, is a scandal that came as a result of a Canadian federal government "sponsorship program" in the province of Quebec and involving the Liberal Party of Canada, which was in power from 1993 to 2006. The program was originally established as an effort to raise awareness of the Government of Canada's contributions to Quebec industries and other activities in order to counter the actions of the Parti Québécois government of the province that worked to promote Quebec independence.
The program ran from 1996 until 2004, when broad corruption was discovered in its operations and the program was discontinued. Illicit and even illegal activities within the administration of the program were revealed, involving misuse and misdirection of public funds intended for government advertising in Quebec. Such misdirections included sponsorship money awarded to ad firms in return for little or no work, which firms maintained Liberal organizers or fundraisers on their payrolls or donated back part of the money to the Liberal Party. The resulting investigations and scandal affected the Liberal Party of Canada and the then government of Prime Minister Paul Martin. It was an ongoing affair for years, but rose to national prominence in early 2004 after the program was examined by Sheila Fraser, the federal auditor general. Her revelations led to the government establishing the Gomery Commission to conduct a public inquiry and file a report on the matter.
In the national spotlight, the scandal became a significant factor in the lead-up to the 2006 federal electionLiberals were defeated by the Conservatives, who formed a minority government that was sworn in February 2006. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sponsorship_scandal
 The opposition parties have begun to attempt to frame the CPC in a negative frame by invoking ADSCAM. Is that a smart move or another mistake by the Liberal Party. The story of ADSCAM is still in the News especially in QC with on going trials.


The sponsorship program, designed to enhance the federal government's profile, funnelled millions of tax dollars to Liberal Party-friendly advertising firms for little or no work. The adscam was instrumental in virtually wiping out the Liberal Party in Quebec, driving the Grits out of power in the 2006 federal election. www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2009/10/21/quebec-sponsorship-scandal-scoc-globe-appeal.html



Does it make sense for the Liberal Party to ask voters to compare EAP to Adscam?


 Framing
Language always comes with what is called "framing." Every word is defined relative to a conceptual framework. If you have something like "revolt," that implies a population that is being ruled unfairly, or assumes it is being ruled unfairly, and that they are throwing off their rulers, which would be considered a good thing. That's a frame.

If you then add the word "voter" in front of "revolt," you get a metaphorical meaning saying that the voters are the oppressed people, the governor is the oppressive ruler, that they have ousted him and this is a good thing and all things are good now. All of that comes up when you see a headline like "voter revolt" — something that most people read and never notice. But these things can be affected by reporters and very often, by the campaign people themselves. ming.tv/flemming2.php/__show_article/_a000010-001361.htm




Does it make sense for the Liberal Party
to scream scandal every other week?


This WEEK in the NEWS......October 24, 2009

Silence on corruption in Quebec must end: investigator

A group of about 40 investigators, prosecutors and civilian employees from government organizations like Quebec's construction commission will join an integrated squad put together after months of media reports alleging corruption involving construction companies and municipal governments, making it the dominant issue in elections in Montreal and other cities.www.ottawacitizen.com/news/todays-paper/Silence+corruption+Quebec+must+investigator/2140148/story.html



The former head of the Liberal Party of Canada's Quebec wing will find out in a few weeks whether Quebec Court Judge Suzanne Coupal bought the remorse card when she sentences Corbeil Dec. 4.2009

The defence is asking for an absolute discharge, while the Crown wants Corbeil to spend between 18 and 24 months behind bars and pay back the people he defrauded.

Corbeil, 45, pleaded guilty in June to one count each of influence-peddling and fraud. He accepted $50,000 from Réal Ouimet, owner of a quarry and paving company, to help him buy land belonging to the federal government. He also signed six false invoices amounting to $117,300. The money came out of the Liberal Party's bank account and into the hands of Giuseppe Morselli, a Liberal fundraiser. www.montrealgazette.com/news/Complete+discharge+could+follow+Corbeil+tearful+apology/2140866/story.html


 Since 2006 the Liberals and the opposition have been alleging alleging scandals, abuse, scary Harper almost without fail.  Has the public finally had enough of the opposition "crying wolf"?


On a much brighter note Global Warming might help our tourism



Saturday, October 17, 2009

Liberals need help to stop the Government Economic Action Plan Advertising

The Liberals are publicy whining about "oversized" cheques, publicity stunts, signs, advertising .

 Reporter Asks: Do you have any proof of illegal activities?

David McGuinty admits:  Nope we just don't want the PM or CPC MP's to use oversize cheques and continue with these PR stunts.

The Liberals new weapon: Code of Ethics! Liberals request begs Ethics Commissioner please SAVE us from the Harper advertising, publicity stunts with oversized cheques, "expensive" large signs outside buildings.

Reporter states your BROTHER'S face is all over the Ontario Government website! 

David McGuinty looks confused trying to explain  the reporters comments about several Premiers, MMP, City Councillors use similar "PR" stunts. (Are they wrong too? Are you going to apply the same standard on your brother and Ethics Commissioner for the Provincial Government?)

David McGuinty wants Liberals allowed, invited to those "PR" stunts and wants Liberal MP's to take photos to get credit. David MGuinty states the PM's "PR" is lame!


Reporters ask questions that make David McGuinty look partisan and small. David refers to Gerrad Kennedy as his "source" for facts in same breath Kevin Page is unable to review the numbers. David McGuinty makes claims about abuses about the program that they can't get the details from.

A reporter asks: Is this like the Sponsorship Scandal? 

David McGuinty say yes. 

We are going to expose the "Harper" Government for use of propaganda, ethical regulations.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/groupaction/gomeryreport_findings.html


Liberal Protestors (massive outcry outside Tims Hortons!)


The scathing report used words such as "scandalous" and "appalling" to describe how the Liberal government abused the system.
She found that $100 million was paid to a variety of communications agencies in the form of fees and commissions and said the program was basically designed to generate commissions for these companies rather than to produce any benefit for Canadians.

Public Works officials "broke just about every rule in the book" when it came to awarding contracts to Groupaction, which was paid millions doing work for the government under the sponsorship program, Fraser said.


'Boondoggle' minister leaving politics

She became the minister at Human Resources Development Canada in 1999, shortly after the news broke that $1-billion in job creation money couldn't be accounted for.Some of it had been directed to projects in Liberal ridings that didn't qualify for the program.




Stress and Anxiety levels have been rising in the Liberals


Massive outcry Liberal Protest! (Notice the close cropped shot?)
In April, a few weeks after he was chosen to lead the Liberals, Michael Ignatieff posted a positive momentum score, a feat that was unattainable for either Stephen Harper or Jack Layton. During the summer, Ignatieff maintained a better momentum score than the two other main federal leaders.

In mid-October, the Liberal leader has seen his standing drop dramatically. A majority of Canadians (51%) say their opinion of Ignatieff has worsened over the course of the past month, while only six per cent report an improvement. The Grit leader's momentum score is -45.

Harper has seen his best numbers of the year, with 16 per cent of respondents saying their opinion of the Prime Minister has improved (up seven points since August) and 28 per cent saying it has worsened, for a momentum score of -12.

Layton also has a negative momentum score of -12, but the vast majority of respondents (62%) say their views on the NDP leader have not fluctuated over the course of the past month.

A press release from the Liberal Party on September 25, 2009 clearly demostrates a party that is in panic and a high level of anxiety.

CapituLayton Chronicles  

Published on September 25, 2009


Here’s what the NDP propped up this week:
  1. A Minister of Health who has still not apologized for the delivery of body bags to Aboriginal communities;
  2. A government that is spending five times as much on taxpayer funded partisan ads than on an H1N1 education campaign;
  3. A Prime Minister who skipped out on a UN conference on climate change to do a corporate promotion event which could have been scheduled any time;
  4. A government that failed to deliver on job creation infrastructure stimulus because they were too busy focusing on photo-ops and pork barrel politics;
  5. A Minister of Fisheries who sent out a press release promoting an escort service instead of a hotline to support lobster fishermen
  6. A government that refuses to fund a medical device research facility in Markham “because it’s held by the Liberals”

 Signs of Liberals who may have a bedwetting problem

 
A visit to Lib blogs shows stress and anxiety is at a very high level after momentum for the MI has dropped dramatically.


The Polls reflect a distraught Liberal party at 25-30% National support and if an election were to be called they would be unable to stop the CPC from winning and possibly capturing a majority.


For many Liberal Bloggers the discussion of the CPC gaining a majority and for their party being kept out of power is a very stressful issue. Some of these bloggers like to equate the current CPC with fascist dictators who were responsible for the deaths of millions. They repeat conspiracy theories and claim a right wing group from the US and Western Canada are trying to destroy Canada.

For some of these Liberal bloggers they have convinced themselves a CPC majority would damage the country and the changes would be irreversible.

Some of these Liberal bloggers blame TV ads, dirty tricks for their party's failure to win support for the last four years. The latest replacement MI who is just visiting has wasted a modest honeymoon phase and now is polling in a range to reflect the worst showing P.O.P. since confederation again.


Stress and Anxiety (con't)


Psychological
Psychological issues (e.g., death in the family, sexual abuse, extreme bullying) are established as a cause of secondary nocturnal enuresis (a return to bedwetting),[10] but are very rarely a cause of PNE-type bedwetting.[8][11]
When Enuresis is caused by a psychological disorder, the bedwetting is considered a symptom of the disorder. Enuresis does have a psychological diagnosis code (see previous section), but it is not considered a psychological condition itself.[4] (See section on psychological/social impact, below)


If you have only recently started to wet the bed, it could be caused by:
  • urine infection
  • alcohol, coffee or diuretic medicines
  • sleeping tablets
  • diabetes
  • stress and anxiety
  • other conditions

Tory billboard blitz sparks outcry according to the Toronto Star.

A photograph of five-six people staged outside a recent EAP presentation qualifies as an outcry?





Stress and Anxiety at Lib blogs
 As far as Ignatieff, 49 per cent of respondents believe he is arrogant, 44 per cent say he is intelligent, 42 per cent brand him as out of touch, 37 per cent believe he is boring, 32 per cent say he is inefficient, and 27 per cent brand him as secretive.

Since August, views on Ignatieff have increased dramatically—by at least five points—on being arrogant, inefficient, dishonest, weak, out of touch, and foolish.
If the Polling numbers don't improve, get worse, I suspect higher levels of stress and anxiety for the Liberal bloggers and deeply devoted partisans.

Treatment options with high success rates