Sunday, February 21, 2010

Has The Coalition Learned From Their Mistakes?

A former NDP national campaign director, he writes uncommonly well for someone who's been in the business of clip and spin.- Norman Spector on Brian Topp's book.
The not so funny period following the economic update started a plan that was developed years ago by a leader of a party that have never won 20% of the popular vote.
  • Dion did not have permission to offer the NDP a seat at the table.
  • Bob Rae was kept in the shadows.
  • Gilles Duceppe thought the photo of himself included might not sell well out West.
  • The letter sent to the GG in 2004 was not the same as the one in 2008.
  • Jack Layton viewed the 2004 letter as a "pressure tactic".
  • Harper and Duceppe did not complain after the NDP reneging on the letter labelling it a coalition government agreement in 2004.
  • Chretien was being offered to lead the coalition by a Liberal elder.
Judging from the proposals recently put forward by Messrs. Ignatieff and Layton to prevent the Governor-General from ever again agreeing to prorogue the House in a situation akin to December 2008 -- proposals that are anticipated in the final part of Topp's book -- that certainly would appear to be the game plan.-Norman Spector
Did Jack or Brian forget to compare notes before publishing this book about the agreement in 2004 and how it was identical to 2008. You can decide.
Many of us believe the Coalition has the real hidden agenda and will try to limit the power of the GG and the Prime Minister 2010/2011. The goal for Jack, Michael (Bob) will be to win enough seats to form a minority without the Bloc and remove their confidence within the first few weeks after the next General Election.

2 comments:

Bec said...

No question, the COALITION, as many of us proved, was the desired outcome of a minority 2008 election. Going in, the Liberals and Dippers had more seats and would not have needed the Bloc should they have sustained those #'s but alas, they didn't.
I also believe it is why, they didn't push the strategic voting in 2008 as they had previously and why Layton campaigned to be the "next Prime Minister".

The Chretien connection is interesting and oh such typical slime, coming from the entitled Liberals.

I have also noted that rarely do we see Liberals debating Dippers on the Blogs or Liberal MP's chastising Dipper MP's in media forums.
They have become one in the same and if the media had scruples, they would request one or the other on their panels because indeed, they are planning to team up, without question.
What a nightmare! I need the vacation I'm about to take, phew!

The_Iceman said...

Their biggest obstacle now is that this parliament has lived long enough that if it falls the GG pretty much has to call an election (at least the opposition has to assume that). If they collapse the government anytime soon, there will be hell to pay. If and when they do collapse the government and we go into an election campaign, they will be forced to answer the question "would you form a coalition government?" If they say yes, they guarantee a loss, if they say no and do it anyway, they lose all credibility.