Showing posts with label Marxism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marxism. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Yes We Can: Ronald Regan

Chinese poster featuring Marx, Engels, Lenin, ...


I think, therefore I’m guilty

‘Politically correct’ views all derive from anti-Western, secular ideologies such as anti-capitalism, anti-imperialism, utilitarianism, feminism, multiculturalism and environmentalism. These all share the aim of overturning the established order in the West. So any groups who have power within that order can never be offended or hurt because they are themselves offensive and hurtful, while ‘powerless’ groups can never be other than victims.
This obsession with power is, of course, a Marxist position; indeed, ‘political correctness’ is a form of cultural Marxism. But how has good old empirical, pragmatic, anti- ideological Britain succumbed to such extremism? Part of the explanation is that, with the collapse of Soviet communism, the left shifted its focus from economics and politics to the cultural arena. Employing Gramsci’s tactic of ‘the long march through the institutions’, it captured the citadels of the culture for a variety of Utopian ideas.
Class divisions would give way to equality, capitalist despoliation of the earth would be replaced by prelapsarian agrarian communes and all hatred, prejudice and irrationality would be excised from the human heart.
Like all ideologies, these Utopian fantasies wrenched facts and evidence to fit their governing idea. Independent thought thus became impossible — which inevitably resulted in an attack upon freedom, because reason and liberty are inseparable bed- fellows.
Because these creeds purported to embody unchallengeable truths, they could permit no dissent. Reason was thus replaced by bullying, intimidation and the suppression of debate. What we are living through is therefore a fresh mutation of the previous despotism's of first the medieval church and then the totalitarian political movements of the 20th century.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, May 15, 2010

News Media: Journalists Should Report Their Own Personal Bias on Blogs

"The greatest problem with news is not that journalists are influenced by their perceptions," Haskell writes. "The greatest problem is that news audiences do not realize journalists are influenced by their perceptions."
In 2000 was Stockwell Day was destroyed for his religious views?
Were the media to blame? Is our own bias responsible for how we feel about how the media is being blamed?
 
Most of the national television journalists who completed his questionnaire revealed that they have little personal interest in religion and that they view evangelicals with disdain.
 
 
..reviewer John P. Ferré finds there is not enough solid evidence to support the claims. The sample was too small. I recommend looking at his lists.
 
Resolution for the CBC and other Canadian media outlets that feel it might be necessary or important to update their journalistic Code of Ethics and provide viewers, critica an oppotunity to engage, restore credibility in their brand or product.

Do journalists report more favourably on people that they like than on those they don’t? Canada’s evangelicals think so. For years, they’ve accused the country’s news personnel of being prejudiced against them both personally and in their coverage. However, up to now, the evangelicals’ charge of media bias has never been empirically examined. This book puts that charge to the test. An in depth survey of national news personnel accompanied by an extensive, multi-year examination of news coverage reveals how Canada’s journalists feel about evangelicals, how they report on evangelicals, and how and when their feelings influence their reporting. In the end, this book concludes when the beliefs and actions of Canadian evangelicals directly clash with the heart-felt convictions of Canadian national journalists, the journalists are willing to abandon their professional objectivity and slant their stories against their ideological opponents.- David M. Haskell


OR
 
They can delay and whitewash the entire controversy. Let it just blow over and in a few months it will be forgotten. If the Management is serious about the brand, they should use this as an opportunity to rebuild and reconnect.
 
Require a disclosure of  Personal Opinions on Major Issues from the journalists so viewers can have that extra information. A series of 100+ questions.
  • Education
  • Role of Government
  • Birth Control, Abortion, who should pay?
  • Family, Marriage
  • Equality what does it mean?
  • Religion: Role Conspiracy Theory
  • Pensions: Public, Private, Who is responsible to pay?
  • Justice: Criminal Punishment, Rehabilitation, Capital Punishment etc.
  • Taxation basic services or wealth redistribution etc.
  • Division of Powers: Large Federal Government vs Provincial, Municipal Authority
  • Individual Responsibility vs Collectivism
  • Political Ideology: Socialism, Marxism, Oligarchy, Theocracy, Democracy etc.
  • Economic Education Litmus Test: How things work.
  • Global, Interprovincial, Free Markets vs Protectionism, Union Supply Side (Quebec Dairy)
Everyone has a bias or a lens in which they feel something is good or bad and it does affect how you react. I do like the recommendations in having journalists report their own biases including their preferences on a large number of topics as a side note on a blog as for more disclosure.
 
Inside the CBC
 
The Iceman has posted Measuring CBC Bias and Alberta Ardvark has posted on the CBC here. Chasing Apple Pie has a great piece on CBC here showing the problem has existed before the Ekos Research President Frank Graves outing by Kory Teneycke here.
 
Proud to be Canadian has detailed page on the CBC.  I also visit the The Tea Makers for inside scoops.
Enhanced by Zemanta