U.N. Kyoto Treaty obligates Canada (Yes)
U.N. Narcotics Drug Treaty 1961 obligates Canada (No)?
Liberals & NDP don't support Federal Government decision to appeal an Appeals Court Split Decision regardless of Canada being in violation of it's U.N. Treaty.
Justice Minister Rob Nicholson said Tuesday the government will appeal the 2-1 ruling to the Supreme Court of Canada because the B.C. court's judgement regarding jurisdiction was not unanimous. - CTVCanada in in Violation of International Drug Treaties
The UN's drug control agency is to warn Tony Clement, the Health Minister, that Canada is flouting international drug control treaties by enabling illicit drug use at a safe injection site in Vancouver and through drug-paraphernalia giveaways elsewhere. - National PostAre the Liberals and the NDP in favour of increasing sites for distribution of narcotics in Canada?
Are the ties to Big Pharma for the Liberals, or the alliance with the Marjuana Party voters for the NDP a valid reason for increasing sites for distribution of narcotics in Canada?
Should narcotics be funded by our government while flouting our international treaties with the UN?
A short review of the Liberals and NDP illustrate the dependency for use tax payer funding for their idealogy.
2003- A Liberal Majority in Parliament provided existing political parties an advantage over future political parties. The Liberals who came to power in the 1990's had secured another majority in 2000 were to benefit with this new policy.
Source: Pundits Guide
What political party would benefit the most from a P.O.P. funding formula?
Source: Pundits Guide
Based on the last election 2000, in 2004 how much is the $ 1.50-$ 1.75 subsidy worth to the Liberal Party? For the Liberals a subsidy would represent $7,878046.5 at $ 1.50 of taxpayers money. A subsidy representing 63% of their spending limit in 2000).
AND THE INCOME TAX ACT (POLITICAL FINANCING)
With the stroke of a pen - and a none-too-democratic motion ending parliamentary debate - the federal Liberals have undertaken the single greatest act of reform since parliamentary pages got to wear non-polyester jackets in the House.- David Russell
Big Pharma Liberal Party
I will refer to a Victoria Times Colonist item bylined Juliet O’ Neill. It is titled "Liberal candidate Volpe to return cash from Children." (June 2, 2006 issue). O’Neill informs that Volpe got 20 identical contributions of $5,400, totaling $108,000 from 20 executives and relatives of executives of Apotex.
The news of this outpouring of "democratic donations" was served to us garnished with comments from Volpe himself. He pronounced the money in question thoroughly kosher and fit for democratic consumption. Perhaps he sees this cash torrent as manifesting to how badly Canada feels the need to be led into the future by Joe Volpe - who knows!
For the record, Apotex is an American pharmaceutical multinational, with a "branch plant" in Canada. Of course it is well known that America has made it its business to democratize politics around the world and this may explain Apotex’s interest in Joe Volpe and likely other candidates for PM, MP or what you have. The Apotex "Joe Volpe for Prime Minister" team is, or was before attrition due to refunds, 20 strong, multi-sex and multi-age, thoroughly representative of Canadian demographics, albeit contrasting sharply the Canadian financial mosaic. -CoyneLiberals & NDP fearmongering over supply of H1N1 How much did Big Pharma make?
Reality
Stephen Taylor nails the Liberals for their games.
In the same year a Big Pharma company was awarded a sole supplier contract worth $3.2 million and subsequently donated over $ 53,000 to the Liberal Party?
NDP links with Marjuana Party -Straight
Cheech & Chong (Up In Smoke)
Dana Larsen, a senior manager of the Vancouver Seed Bank, is running for the NDP in West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast-Sea to Sky Country.
Is the Federal Government acting in a reasonable manner in seeking the Supreme Court ruling in resolving the dispute of jurisdiction regarding the narcotics site being supported by the NDP and Liberals?
Updated: Today's blog's post was inspired by the comments found at Climbing Out of The Dark from Alberta Ardvark.
5 comments:
Those pesky UN treaties. They come in handy when you are smearing your own country's soldiers with allegations of war crimes, but not so much when you are supporting illegal government sanctioned drug use.
What is the left to do?
Yes, your comments gave me the idea to blog about it!. I forgot to h/t.
Thanks again for the inspiration on this post.
Not a problem and as usual you did a hell of a job with this post.
I think the CPC should be sending out 10% asking if the Liberal MP/NDP MP support an insite facility in their riding.
Shine a light on this issue and watch them run for cover.
Amazing isn't it CS, that the OPPOSITION PARTIES and their media dwell on every sentence the UN makes; yet when it points to them to do exactly that; the opposition parties change their tune.
Safe injection site breaks treaties, UN agency says
"There's been no question that the Conservatives, politically, have an agenda where they don't support Insite, they've made that pretty clear from day one," said NDP MP Libby Davies, who added her concern that Clement will use the INCB's position to bolster that "agenda."
Davies said the board is "out of touch" with the work that Insite is doing in Vancouver and the Downtown Eastside, specifically.
"I feel like they are poking their noses into something they know nothing about. Let Insite do it's job. It's working really well," she said.
http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=f9922177-8a0b-4f2f-8323-8bec41ef2819&k=70372
Post a Comment