Friday, February 19, 2010

Why Are The Liberals Silent On Targeted Assassination?

Covert killing remains illegal and immoral. Targeted assassinations don't get rid of the Abbas al-Musawis of the world, they just replace them with the Hassan Nasrallahs. And when the same illegal and immoral acts are perpetrated against "our" side, when it is our ally being smothered in his bed, blown up by a booby-trapped telephone, or poisoned with a piece of candy, what do we do? Cry foul? Plot revenge? Death squads and democracy are a bad fit, as Gen. Augusto Pinochet so ably demonstrated. Is something afoot? - Michael Harris, Ottawa Sun February 19, 2010.

Why are Liberals who are always eager to talk about our global reputation SILENT?

This video may explain why, you decide.


The_Iceman said...

Wow, that clip should be a Tory campaign commercial, with some more current statements spliced in.

Anonymous said...

Here is another video worth watching.

Jen said...

I can give you four reasons why and the sixth is' why do you think the liberals went against the 'anti-terrorist act bill.
Plus have you seen the opposition parties behaviour when it came to OMAR KHADR and the taliban detainees?
There you have it.

Anonymous said...

Iggy IS American. At least in this clip he believes he is. Now? Not so much.

CanadianSense said...

that clip is compliments of an NDP blogger. Funny clips if you got to his youtube channel.

CanadianSense said...


strange how the apologists for the Liberals refer to Harper "firewall" without understanding what it actually contains.

1) Provincial Pension like QC
2) Provincial Police like Ontario
and more control of provincial files, unlike the apologist for G.W.B. and the Empire Lite use of torture and assassination.